Criteria

Every Trino review on this site scores six criteria: welcome offer, ongoing promos, payment speed and method coverage, game lobby size, mobile experience, and customer support quality. We weight them according to how often UK readers actually search for them — payment and bonus questions carry more than game count, because that is what people ask us about most. The methodology is deliberately short: a long checklist encourages padding, and we prefer to say less and mean it.

Re-review cycle

We re-check every active Trino page at least once every 90 days, and immediately if a reader tells us something has changed. Bonus terms, deposit methods and app version numbers are the fastest-moving items, so they often get patched between full reviews. The date at the top of each page shows when it was last verified against the operator's own site.

Scoring

Scores run on a five-point scale, with half points allowed. A score of 4.0 means solid, typical of what UK players expect in 2026. Anything above 4.5 is reserved for offers that measurably outperform the market — faster payouts, lower wagering, a broader lobby. Below 3.0 we stop recommending the page and either rewrite it or take it down.

Weights table

Payments 25%, welcome bonus 20%, ongoing promos 15%, game lobby 15%, mobile experience 15%, support 10%. The weights add up to 100% and we show them here so you can decide whether our priorities match yours. If, for example, mobile matters more to you than payment speed, you can read the individual section scores on each review and make your own call.

What lowers score

Hidden wagering, opaque bonus terms, cash-out delays beyond 72 hours, limited GBP deposit methods and support that cannot answer in English all drop the score. A missing UK Gambling Commission licence is an automatic exclusion — we only cover operators licensed to serve British players.